- Local every day in
Frustration Remains Following Meeting on Grosse Pointe Farms Floods
Many residents left without the answers they were hoping to get. Meanwhile some actions are being taken while officials continue their investigation.
Grosse Pointe Farms residents filled the ballroom of the War Memorial Thursday night spilling into the lobby to hear answers from city officials about the most recent raw sewage and storm water backup into their basements.
Many left in frustration or irritation before the meeting adjourned shortly after 11 p.m.
Residents spoke of their damaged goods, their stress, their irritation and most of all, their frustrations. They are frustrated the city doesn't have many of the answers they seek, namely how the problem is going to be fixed to prevent such flooding from happening yet again.
Ultimately, they want to know if, and when, they should fix their basements from the most recent flooding Sept. 9 to 10, especially considering many had only recently finished the repairs to the same area from similar flooding in May.
The council along with Mayor James Farquhar, City Manager Shane Reeside, most of the department heads, representatives from the contracted engineering firm, Hubble, Roth & Clarke, and DTE answered questions throughout the four hour special meeting.
Reeside said repeatedly that city officials are investigating the exact cause for the Sept. 10 flooding. The circumstances leading to the flooding on May 25 vary a lot from Sept. 10, Reeside said.
The suspicion is that the mechanism responsible for switching the pump operation from one main line of power to the other when power is lost to the first malfunctioned, councilman Peter W. Waldmeir said afterward.
The pump station is set up with three sources of power: two main lines serviced by DTE and a backup generator. The system is designed to automatically switch sources of power if one goes down but officials believe that didn't happen when the first main line began experiencing a power shortage or outage.
The station was not manned and therefore there was some response time necessary for a person to drive to the station to determine the problem. Officials do not know however, if indeed this was the only problem or if there are more that are contributing to the situation.
While both city officials and DTE officials conduct their investigations, the city is taking action as a measure to prevent another such occurrence, Reeside said.
- Since the May flooding, the city has installed more than 30 restricted manhole covers, which reduce the rate at which the water enters the sewer system. This is a strategy employed in Grosse Pointe Woods to help ease or provide relief from basement flooding.
- More than 10,000 linear feet of sewer lines in the inland district have been video surveilled and cleaned in the inland district.
- City officials met with the Department of Environmental Quality earlier this summer in regards to a comprehensive study of the pump station.
- The city has re-initiated its downspout inspection program. An ordinance restricts downspouts from flowing directly into the sewer system.
In addition to the city's efforts, DTE is also taking several investigative steps:
- Completing a capacity study on the main power lines to the station.
- Checking the trees along the main sources of power to ensure none are interfering.
- Helping the city install electrical monitors at the pump station to measure the consistency and quality of power going into the station.
Grosse Pointe Farms also intends to have the pump station manned 24 hours per day until the exact problem is revealed and handled.
Dozens of residents lined up throughout the meeting to ask questions. Many referred to the inland district as the area of the city that is forgotten or ignored by city officials and listed the flooding as one more way in which they are treated differently than the rest of the city. One resident even referred to it as "the armpit of the Farms."
Residents also asked questions about the city's insurance policies, premiums and coverage. They asked very specific questions about the pump station, about specific pumps and about a backup generator.
The separation of the combined storm water/raw sewage removal system was brought up several times as well. According to a study done in the late 1990s, the estimate to get the system separated was about $24 million—an amount that was not financially feasible at the time.
Councilmen Louis Theros and Waldmeir tried to reassure the crowd that despite the class action lawsuit filed this week in the May 25 flooding, the city was doing its best to provide information and answers. Theros went on to say that often a lawsuit would have impeded such a meeting from even happening but they were not allowing that to happen.
To end the meeting, Farquhar told those remaining in the audience that even though it may seem as if the city isn't doing much or taking the flooding issue seriously, they are. He explained there is a lot of behind-the-scenes work going on by all departments and a true desire to solve the problem.
david barthel
9:53 am on Friday, September 16, 2011
So they don't have a great idea of what is wrong, no REAL remediation plan, 500 homeowners are out $10,000 or so AGAIN, and nobody can refinish their basements because it does rain from time to time. I just drove through a beautiful development in Rochester Hills...
Mom
10:02 am on Friday, September 16, 2011
Great article. You did forget to report the raucous laughter when representatives of the City made, what sounded like, silly comments and arguments. And the many (good-natured but sincere) catcalls and jeers regarding many of the City responses, e.g. the City's answer to why the July episodes of flooding in many of the same homes flooded in May and September were not "the same" or in any way the fault of the City.
sue
10:08 am on Friday, September 16, 2011
Mays flood was an act of nature/God so no reimbursements, they swept July right under the rug claiming only a handful of residents were impacted although later he conceded what he meant was it might have been the street mains that backed up but it just wasn't the pumping station that caused July, and Sept DTE primarily to blame.
No substantive insurance ( $100,000 was what they said they carry).
The engineering firm who have been on the city payroll since the 90's are investigating their own work.
They are applying for state funds in a mid to late October ( lets hope it doesn't rain in the interim!) but didn't say what they would do with that money. No time line was given for repairs and frankly I did not here them conceded anything needed to be repaired. They indicated a new back up generator was or would be added but that is pretty much all I heard.
They said the street mains have been cleaned but I do not believe it given the amount of dirt on the roads that came up from city drains.
Did I forget anything? Anyone want to add or amend my summary? I think this sums up the most insulting meeting I have ever attended!
KDD
3:18 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011
Act of God:
1) In law, an accident caused by the operation of extraordinary natural force. The effect of ordinary natural causes (e.g., that rain will leak through a defective roof) may be foreseen and avoided by the exercise of human care; failure to take the necessary precautions constitutes negligence, and the party injured in the accident may be entitled to damages. An act of God, however, is so extraordinary and devoid of human agency that reasonable care would not avoid the consequences; hence, the injured party has no right to damages. Accidents caused by tornadoes, perils of the sea, extraordinary floods, and severe ice storms are usually considered acts of God, but fires are not so considered unless they are caused by lightning.
2) Violent and catastrophic event caused by forces of nature, which could not have been prevented or avoided by foresight or prudence.
A few inches of heavy rain in Michigan is hardly an extraordinary or catastrophic event, and the flooding of May 25th very well could have been prevented by "foresight or prudence" and "the exercise of human care"! Ordinary weather events frequently result in downed trees or loss of electrical power, which is why there are back-up plans and generators (but not in GPF!). The banks of Lake St. Clair didn't unexpectedly overflow into our basements!
Tobias Roberts
10:13 am on Friday, September 16, 2011
It was mentioned last night the the Inland District's sewer connects via the Kerby St pumping station to the Fox Creek Retention Tank in Detroit, then on to DPW for processing. It was also mentioned that on the night of Sept. 10 that tank was full. Quote of the night, "I'm not an engineer but if 8 pumps are pumping water to a retention tank that is full..."
Q1: Was that retention tank full on May 25?
Q2: What is plan B when the retention tank is full? Where can the Kerby St. Pumping Station send the water?
Q3: Is this a DPW problem? Are they not processing the water from Fox Creek fast enough?
Kerby St. Pumping station could in fact be fully operational but if it has no place to pump the water it seems like it will end up in our basements again.
Tommy
10:16 am on Friday, September 16, 2011
I was at the meeting and I was a appalled the city officials had no answers especially to the May 25 flooding. Also it came out in the meeting basements flooded July 24 on the 200 block of Cloverleaf which many of the more than 500 hundred people that attended didn't even know. Shane Reeside earlier comment about the July 24 flooding was due to individual home owners not having their drains maintained until one resident on Cloverleaf got up to the mike and read the riot act to Shane Reside, .when he than began to change his former statement that he made. One resident on Colonial court said the estimated damage from the May 25 flooding was between $300,000 to $750,0000 dollars and the city of GPF has no insurance to cover a home owners loss other than a $100,000 insurance rider policy. Shame, shame on the incompetent leadership in GPF. or should I say there is no leadership at ALL ! ! !
sue
10:17 am on Friday, September 16, 2011
That young man was outstanding, if he wasn't an engineer he sure had sought out expert advise as those questions were very thoughtful and clever!
MovingOn
11:05 am on Friday, September 16, 2011
I am a single business owner of a consulting business and I carry 10 times the amount of insurance that the City of Grosse Pointe Farms does. Is this a joke or a further show of incompetence?
As residents of the City of Grosse Pointe Farms, we pay taxes to the city; not to DTE. The city has a fiduciary responsibility to protect its citizens. After the first event, the city should have invested in back-up generators. Blaming DTE is not acceptable. The city needs to step up and take responsibility. They are running a city; not a convenience store.
As citizens of the city, we should demand that the civil engineering contractor be replaced immediately and all current contracts be voided. It is time to move on and reassign budgeted funds to the "Inland" infrastructure. We don't need our tax dollars spent on pools, marinas, club houses and skating rinks when our property values are taking a significant hit.
It's time Mr. Mayor and City Council to do the right thing.
gpf homeowner
9:18 pm on Wednesday, September 28, 2011
I agree. It is sad that it took two HUGE DISASTERS to make the City Manager, Mr. Mayor, and the City Council to finally listen to citizens on the "other side of the tracks." We need to keep showing up at Council Meetings every month and expressing verbally our concerns so they are hear us loud and clear.
Tommy
11:08 am on Friday, September 16, 2011
The meeting September 15 at the Grosse Pointe War Memorial was not large enough for all the people that attended. They need to rent Cobo Hall downtown for the next scheduled meeting ! ! ! Also it was just wonderful to see Channel 2, Channel 4 and Channel 7 all at the Grosse Pointe War Memorial for the coverage of the flooding. It made the lead story at 10:00 PM on Fox 2 news. The 11:00 PM news lead stories for Channel 4 and Channel 7. So much for the property values or trying to sell your home in GPF since everyone in Michigan now knows to not buy a home in Grosse Pointe Farms ! ! !
Maria Raynal
11:25 am on Friday, September 16, 2011
I commend the city for hosting the meeting, but was dismayed at how woefully unprepared they were to answer questions and assure residents this will not happen again. Their lack of knowledge was stunning. And, there seems to be no clear plan in place to permanently fix the problem, just a few temporary measures.
In addition to the good questions above, I can't help but wonder why the emergency pumps (no. 7-8) have no backup generators, why the switch mechanism has no backup in case of failure, why the station was unmanned after May 25 (or at least had an on-call system in the event of big storms) and why the city selected the "low-cost provider" each time they approved major upgrades.
In my view, the system worked fine until the city upgraded the sewers in the inland district several years ago. Shortly afterward, in early January during an uncharacteristic heavy rain, we experienced major basement flooding for no discernable reason -- several plumbers deemed our system fine, the city videotaped our main line, which was clear, and the city claimed it was not an equipment failure on their part. I truly feel for the residents who experienced such terrible damage this summer.
As someone said last night, our elected officials chose to run for these positions and represent us, the residents. Now they face a crisis, and they need to rise to the occasion, demonstrate and demand accountability and find a permanent solution. It's times like these that define good leaders...
Mom
11:29 am on Friday, September 16, 2011
Hooray for "small business owner" who realizes that we have spent many years constructing lovely, luxury edifices in the Farms (which REQUIRE MANY DOLLARS to maintain) with no vote and little input from citizens. Helloooo. The inland district could use some of those tax dollars.
James Zann
12:05 pm on Friday, September 16, 2011
I attended the meeting as many of my fellow peasants did and only after reading this article did I glean the information that "Grosse Pointe Farms also intends to have the pump station manned 24 hours per day until the exact problem is revealed and handled." Am I missing something??? Why was the pump station not manned 24/7 after the May event. Given that they are no closer to understaning the cause the 2nd time around and that "The station was not manned and therefore there was some response time necessary for a person to drive to the station to determine the problem", I would think it would have been beneficial and slightly PROACTIVE to have considered this from the first wipe-out.
I'm sure there would have been many volunteers to take a hour or two shift to watch if there was a pump failure and send up the Batman signal. Or..... pay someone minimum wage for this task. That's much cheaper than 500 homes x $10,000 = $5,000,000. Start thinking outside of the box and FIX THIS!
Sara Eaton Martin
12:29 pm on Friday, September 16, 2011
James, the manning of the pump station came up after many people already left as a result of a question by a resident. The station was being manned in May and despite the manning, the flooding still occurred. The station was not being manned on Sept. 9/10 but had it been, essentially there would have been less response time for a person to drive to the station to discover what wasn't working. Shane Reeside said that because there hadn't been a history of undependable service from DTE, they did not believe the interruptions to all of the power sources would occur again-- therefore they didn't think having round-the-clock manning was necessary because they believed they understood the cause of the May flooding & it was out of their control.
There was quite a bit of information that came out later in the evening and I'll be doing more stories about some of the specific topics that came up in order to provide the necessary detail. This story had to focus on the meeting but I'd like to get into more of the issues soon!
Sara
Mom
1:18 pm on Friday, September 16, 2011
Sara -
We will really look forward to the additional articles. Are you aware of the sanitary sewer flooding at Kerby Field near the dog park? The Community Building (party building) at the Pier Park also flooded with sewer water, a wedding reception was held the next day and one is scheduled for tomorrow with sanitation yet to take place.
KNUTZ!
2:01 pm on Friday, September 16, 2011
The City's explanation for the May flood, that it was a combination of events is acceptable to me. Many residents had not experienced flooding for several decades, so the power outage is a viable excuse. However, that premise, once accepted by the City and the Citizens, makes the city completely liable for the damage in September. In their own words, they knew why the first flood occurred, a failure of DTE to provide sufficient power. The solution then was to ensure that power was available to the pumps. So they either chose not to fix the problem or didn't know how to fix the problem. Either way, it was incumbent on them to fix the problem after the first time it occurred. Admitting it was a power supply problem this time only demonstrates that they did not address the problem. They should have had the ability and knowledge to prevent the second flood but did not. It is obvious that once the pumps were turned on that the water receded. That is negligence.
david barthel
2:16 pm on Friday, September 16, 2011
@ KNUTZ- I completely agree with that assesment. Is it true the city only has $100K in insurance in this case??? Sounds like our only recourse is another lawsuit. What else can we do?
Robin Posada
2:43 pm on Friday, September 16, 2011
David - The $100,000 is an accurate statement, at least according to what one of the officals said last night. It was also uncovered by a resident's line of questioning (he seemed very "lawyerly") that the letter the City sent to us may have been inaccurate and that the City knew it would not be paying any claims on the May incident because they did not have sewer back-up coverage in their policy. When further questioned why the City sent the claim paperwork out in the first place, the answer was that they were required to do so by law. So, we spend our time filling out claim forms that someone presumably just turns around and throws in the wastebasket!!
gpfresident
4:34 pm on Friday, September 16, 2011
When that came out (they sent the paperwork for the claim and knew nobody would receive any compensation) that really made me mad...yet agai...at our wonderful city leaders. It is unbelievable to me that Shane didnt even know who wrote the letter, who signed it, who looked at it etc... The city engineer has no idea how many linear feet of sewer lines there are so could not respond to the question of "Is cleaning 10,000 linear feet of lines a big deal in comparison to the total". Incompetence at its finest.
Tobias Roberts
2:18 pm on Friday, September 16, 2011
Just received a call from my Insurance Company's subrogation department. They are going after the city to try and reclaim the payout made to me (and others).
Sara Eaton Martin
3:21 pm on Friday, September 16, 2011
Below is a comment I'm posting for a Farms resident who encountered some technology glitches in trying to post it on his own.
"What was clear at the meeting was an unsettling gap between the emotions expressed by home owners – above all, frustration – and the businesslike, almost plodding, presentation by city leaders and staff. They showed a slide of six or seven steps they are taking or will take. They spoke of studies and obtaining a grant to fund those studies, of consultants and meetings. All that takes time. Six months? A year? Two years? Meanwhile, OUR horizon is the next rain storm, maybe tomorrow. I heard one promising thing: They will now man the Kerby pump station 24/7. I was stunned to learn that a facility so essential to the health and well being of the community is NOT staffed 24/7. As a result, water must rise high enough to set off an alarm that summons a person to drive to the pump house to determine what the problem is and how to solve it? I’m firmly convinced that had someone been on duty the evening of Sept. 9-10, our backup problem would not have been as severe, and may not have occurred at all. So, when will 24/7 monitoring begin? The answer I want to hear: NOW. TODAY."
James Gerardi, Grosse Pointe Farms
gpfresident
4:42 pm on Friday, September 16, 2011
Probably would have helped if they actually activated pumps 7 and 8 on Sept. 9th during the storm...instead of after. There was no problem with the power...they did not turn on the 2 largest pumps until it was too late. I asked for a response last night to my question "Were pupms 7 and 8 activated during the storm in September?" He looked at the attorney and would not answer directly. To me that is an admission of guilt. Pumps 7 and 8 are essential when there is a large storm and they were NOT turned on until AFTER people started calling...it was too late. Whoever was manning the pumps when they arrived only activated 1-6...did not want to activate 7 and 8 for fear of a power bump because then they would have had to activate all pumps again starting back at pump 1. So a decision to not activate 7 and 8 proved to be very very bad judgement.
Sara Lolar
6:05 pm on Friday, September 16, 2011
@gpfresident. Thanks for this reply. We had to leave and it sounds like a lot of questions were answered later. Why are pumps 7&8 not on ALL the time? Especially if they knew this was a problem? Why can't they be turned on if we know there is a storm coming.
Karen deReyna
5:29 pm on Friday, September 16, 2011
How does one explain how GPF side of Fisher Road flooded, while the GPC side did not?? What is the City doing, that we are not? Same elevation, same amount of rain... how far does one have to look to gain insight into something that might indeed work???
gpf homeowner
8:55 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011
I agree. It is a known fact that none of the Pointes' basements had severe backups like the homes in the "inland district". Also, just across Mack Ave. in GPW, homes had completely dry basements. Same rain. Same elevation.
Julie Lattimore
8:34 pm on Friday, September 16, 2011
The flooding is serious, but it's the tip of the iceberg of problems in Grosse Pointe Farms. The tax department is set up to confuse the citizens. I sent a letter to every member of the city council last year about the messy files, not one responded. Our taxman, Tim O'Donnell, is ripping all of us off. It is encouraged by Reeside and the city council. They have such a mess on their hands, they will go to any extent to hide it!
DCW
10:51 pm on Friday, September 16, 2011
Posting our email that was sent to the following people this evening:
Dear Mayor Farquhar, Mr. Reeside and Mr. Brennan:
Thank you for your time last night to update us and answer questions regarding the multiple basement flooding events that have occurred in our city over the last four months. We appreciated the overview of the situation, as well as the list of action items you communicated during the presentation.
During the Q&A session, we agreed this situation is extraordinary, and the steps needed to fix the issue should be dealt with in an extraordinary manner. Given that, we collectively agreed to weekly status meetings to discuss the progress of each action item provided in your presentation, with the first status meeting beginning on Monday, September 26th at a location to be determined.
We would like the following updates for each Action Item referred to in your presentation:
1. Status (i.e. Not Started, In Progress, Delayed/Pending, Completed, etc.)
2. Person responsible
3. Resources needed
4. Expected start date
5. Expected completion date
6. Additional notes/information/clarification
7. Next Steps
(continued in next post)
DCW
10:52 pm on Friday, September 16, 2011
(continued from previous post)
While we had the opportunity to vent our frustrations last night, I would suggest a few ground rules for these status meetings, such as:
- All questions from the citizens should be specifically related to these action items
- No personal attacks
- Everybody agrees to stay on track with the agenda
- Questions of clarification are encouraged. Disparaging comments are discouraged.
We look forward to achieving an expedient resolution to this extraordinary situation. Our biggest fear is another flooded basement. Having an accountable plan that is communicated on a weekly basis will help ease our fear, and allow us to determine when we can begin the process of reconstructing our basements (again) and replace the contents that were destroyed.
We are proud to call Grosse Pointe Farms our home. Please use this unfortunate situation as an opportunity to demonstrate your leadership, aptitude and perseverance to resolve the issue swiftly.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us. In addition, please reply by end of day Monday, September 19th, to confirm the location and time of the first status meeting on Monday, September 26th.
KDD
3:48 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011
I believe that it was communicated to "us" that the causes of the basement flooding were unknown, so to assume that proceeding with the aforementioned list of "action items" will "ease our fear" and "allow us to determine when we can begin the process of reconstructing our basements" is premature. As noted by another poster, these steps could take years. Furthermore, how is this situation "extraordinary"? Heavy rain is a common occurence in Michigan; problems with the sewers (separated and combined) have been ongoing for years. And in the past few years, the city opted many times to discharge the overflow into the lake, in full compliance of the law, to avoid basements flooding east of Ridge Rd., even after the sewer separation. Clearly, in 2011 the City was simply not prepared for ordinary weather events. I can appreciate the desire to avoid rehashing the experiences that were previously related at the Sept. 15 meeting, but the citizens of GPF do not need "ground rules" to muzzle them at these status meetings. They have the right to be heard, and to respond to what is presented at the time, not be constrained by a preset "agenda." When did "we" collectively decide that these action items were the only points that would be discussed? Whatever anyone wishes to say may or may not conform to your ideas of what constitutes a "personal attack" or "disparaging comments"; who are you to suggest that everyone shouldn't be free to express their concerns at these meetings?
Daniel Salden
10:08 pm on Monday, September 19, 2011
I was at the meeting. As an active local Realtor, I wish I could say that property values are my only concern. I'm sorry to say it felt like a greater waste of time than (re)cleaning our basement. There are so many points to hit on, but the central focus has to be that our job is to pay our taxes, the city is supposed to effectively manage the affairs charged to it. Whether the council will not hold the manager accountable or if the manager is incapable is THE matter that should be explored by the citizens. The engineering is the smoking gun, the (you pick) apathy or incompetence is the murder. The citizens of this fine community have been robbed by those they elected to serve them. Is this same malfeasance being administered in running our police, fire and fresh water? Thus further jeopardizing the fine committed folks that serve us. An even more sobering question to ponder...
gpf homeowner
9:06 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011
I agree there needs accountablility by the city manager!!! No questiion. And... Yes, the City Council should hold the management accountable for all aspects of city government and particularly for the failure of the Combined Sewer issue that caused us soooo much loss. Where are the checks and balances? Keep voicing our concerns.
Another Concerned GPF Resident
2:29 pm on Wednesday, September 21, 2011
If anyone had recieved confirmation of Monday's weekly status meeting, please post it hear for the group. I am interested in attending, but have not seen any details.
DCW
2:57 pm on Wednesday, September 21, 2011
After our email to the City Administrators on Friday night, we received responses over the weekend and on Monday morning. The response on Monday morning indicated that there was a tentative meeting scheduled for Monday, September 26th at the War Memorial at 7:00 p.m., but that it was unconfirmed at that point.
Less than an hour ago, we received a response confirming that the meeting will take place at the time and location above, and that notices were being mailed out today. In addition, the local media would be informed, as well.
gpf homeowner
9:22 pm on Wednesday, September 28, 2011
As far as another meeting, I believe that the GPF is just having this at the Council meeting on Mon. Oct. 3 7:00 p.m. City Hall. We should ALLLLLLLLLLLL show up.
Daniel Salden
6:01 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011
There are some great comments and opinions all thru this thread that need to be (sorry) flushed out. I also agree with KDD on all points. By our losses, we have earned the right to have all our concerns heard no matter how articulate or entertaining we are or aren't. Don't have an answer for the time it will take, another fun consideration of this mess. I hope all will continue to show at the meetings, and hold the city accountable. It's disgusting we have to sue ourselves to get the city to act. I read an article about flooding in Lincoln Park in July. Lincoln Park VOLUNTARILY offered payments ($3000.00) to all affected residents right out of the till. Go figure. Any ideans on why the rental generator (will love to see that bill-sure they'll get a credit toward any purchase...) still isn't hooked up? Also reviewed some of the info the city put out on the Lakeside separation project: "Because this project benefits the entire community, these costs will be borne by all property owners in the city." Guess I didn't read their definition of benefit...?
Again, the real tragedy is that the city doesn't use this to PROMOTE what a great city this is, and how committed the city is to serving it's residents. How they got elected is one story, why we let them stay after this mess is another.
Daniel Salden
9:59 am on Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Sent an email to the editor, but apparently she's out of town, hope this helps folks & doesn't get me bounced off here! http://www.facebook.com/pages/GPF-Inland-District/173896612689917
gpf homeowner
2:28 pm on Wednesday, September 28, 2011
At the Sept. 26 War Memorial Meeting, not all of our questions from the Sept. 15 meeting were answered. Mr. Reeside told us that we would get answers at the next Council Meeting Oct. 3, 7:00p.m. Residents......if you want answers and want action, please attend. They are willing to put this Sewer Backup Issue on the Agenda, so please, let's make it worthwhile.
Also, someone on this website questioned why nothing was done after the May 25 flood. My perception is that not enough residents demanded answers. How terribly sad, but true. So, keeping that in mind, even though we may not get a seat, please stay informed by coming to the City Council Meetings, if this is our only venue. We have the right to be heard, and to be sincerely listened to. (I wonder what the procedure will be for this? Nothing surprises me anymore)